6/30/2023 0 Comments Corel aftershot 3 exif missingRAF files are RAW files, and thus use external XMP files. JPEG and DNG files must use embedded XMP metadata. This usually just works with the default settings. In the XMP export setup, for example, on the metadata 2 tab export is stated as (disabled) and I don't see where that is coming from at all. I've never (willingly) used XMP sidecar files in IMatch, and Mario has pointed out (in another thread) a whole world of XMP sidecar control through preferences>metadata 2>configure file formats which I appreciate but I don't seem to be able to get things working at all. There are a lot of variables though and this is hard for me to figure out. Some tags import from IMatch, but IMatch does not seem to pick up changes in the xmp sidecar file. According to my experience (so far) this seems a bit dodgy. On subsequent imports (or exports) it writes (or reads) metadata to/from the XMP sidecar file. They store tags and information in different ways and there is no easy way to get them to use each other's data, unfortunately.I am having trouble setting up metadata sharing (both import and export) between IMatch and Aftershot Pro 3 for jpg, dng, and raf formats.Īccording to the sparse Corel documentation when ASP imports a photo the first time it reads existing internal metadata and stores it in its database. I really really miss that ability, as what I'm using now (ASP1) isn't as fast and nice.īut the one thing you also asked: is there anything you can do that will let you tag in one system, and use them in another: the answer is definitely "no". I actually wrote some code for KPhotoAlbum that allows super-fast tagging while viewing the images using keys. And I think they're all struggling with providing us the ideal cataloging interface, as none of them make it as easy and fast as it should be. IMHO, no software offers a really good merge of everything. And I still think ASP has the best of the cataloging features. I will say that I believe it is much more close to lightroom, but does feel slower as well. I believe it is, actually, but I haven't used it extensively enough to offer a decent comparison. If I was going to start again today, you should definitely look at darktable which has come a long long way recently and might be better than ASP. That being said, I actually think ASP's hierarchical tags system is better, and the software is actually quite a bit faster browsing, cataloging and managing your images. If you go look at lightroom on windows or OSX you'll find it has higher output quality and a much better filter set. Now, having said all that: ASP is really behind the times when it comes to a decent editor. ASP2 kept crashing and freezing on my system when I installed it so I reverted and haven't tried again yet. Note that these screenshots were taken with ASP1 not ASP2, but it's similar. And you can tag things on import too (eg, mine are all tagged Todo Sort on import so I can find images I haven't finished sorting). Learn to use this, as finding your images suddenly becomes very easy once they're properly tagged. If you create hierarchical tags, then you have the ability to sort later by hierarchy and find the images you want quickly using the metadata browser in the library on the left hand side. That way I can very quickly mark images for different things as I scan through them. I have sets for todo, family members, places, friends, online topics, etc. Make sure you realize you can set up a bunch of tags in use them in the "keyword sets" dialog on the right hand side panel, so it becomes a quick handy way to tag images very quickly. It does do tagging and organizing quite well, though, if you learn how to use it. In terms of commercial software, all you really have available is AfterShot. First off, let me start by saying you're not going to like the answer very much.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |